Editions / Academic medicine

TrialPulse Academic

Academic medicine Dashboard + API

The job to be done

“Show me how my school’s researchers, dollars, and trial mix stack up against every other school of medicine.”

For manufacturers, CROs, and biotech, see TrialPulse Manufacturer.

Research deans get ranked lists of other people’s faculty; TrialPulse Academic benchmarks your whole research enterprise — every funded PI, every dollar, every active trial, and your service-line mix — against all 125 allopathic schools of medicine on one governed panel. Dollars and researcher performance speak BRIMR (Blue Ridge Institute for Medical Research); trial therapeutic mix speaks the Sg2-style clinical-care-forecast service-line language your health-system partners already plan in.

How it works — process view

Why this matters

Recruitment, retention, and space decisions need the whole faculty picture — not the handful of names a directory surfaces
BRIMR is the language deans already report in — benchmarking lands without a taxonomy fight
Service-line trial mix connects the research enterprise to the clinical growth plan your health system runs on

Key features

Whole-faculty researcher benchmarking — every funded PI ranked in-school and against national percentiles

BRIMR-native dollars — school and department award ranks, FY2023–25, plus NIH topic momentum (rising and falling)

Trial-effort service-line mix — active trials classified to clinical-care-forecast service-line groups with national percentile per group

Five-signal composite rank — funding, publications, trials, patents, abstracts — vs all 125 schools

Dashboard delivery, with API endpoints at the enterprise tier

Peer-school comparison mode — put your service-line mix and PI economics side-by-side with any named peer

Industry-engagement view — commercial vs federal/academic sponsorship of your active trial portfolio

The quality process behind it

Named primary source and capture date on every figure — if a number can’t carry its lineage, it doesn’t ship
Append-only history: prior observations are preserved, never overwritten, so point-in-time claims hold up
Enforced refresh cadence with continuous freshness monitoring against an objective coverage yardstick
Analyst review gate before every release — auto-assembled drafts never reach a subscriber unreviewed

Why this outruns AI-alone answers

Momentum is a longitudinal signal — it exists only because every vintage was captured and preserved; the public web keeps only today
Resolving investigator identity across multiple public registries takes a curated match process — generic entity matching quietly mislabels
A ranking your advisory-board budget depends on needs an analyst gate and figure-level lineage, not a plausible-sounding list

By the numbers

125allopathic schools of medicine on one governed benchmarking panel

63,700+active-trial site records captured across the 125-school panel (ClinicalTrials.gov, 2026-08)

FY2018–25of preserved BRIMR and NIH RePORTER vintage history behind every rank

197/3/0PASS / WARN / FAIL on the v0.2 release battery — every deliverable is fact-gated before it ships

100%of figures traceable to a named public source and capture date

How ordering works

1. Request access

Tell us your organization, role, and intended use — most requests get a response within one business day.

2. Qualification review

A brief review confirms scope, licensing lane, and any buyer-type or geography restrictions. We tell you plainly if yours is restricted.

3. Order & payment

Approved orders receive a secure Stripe checkout link — card, ACH debit, Apple Pay — or a countersignable quote. Enterprise orders run on invoice.

4. Entitlement provisioned

Access and delivery entitlements are provisioned the same day payment clears, with license terms attached to the order.

Annual subscription in tiered scopes; dashboard access with API endpoints at the enterprise tier.

Request access Read the methodology